ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the risk factors and treatment of postpancreatico-duodenectomy hemorrhage(PPH).Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of 712 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in Peking University First Hospital from January 2012 to November 2021 were collected. There were 392 males and 320 females, aged from 16 to 89 years, with a median age of 62 years. Observation indicators: (1) diagnosis of PPH; (2) analysis of influencing factors for PPH; (3) treatment of PPH. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages. Univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Logistic regression model. Results:(1) Diagnosis of PPH. Of the 712 patients, 72 cases had PPH and 7 cases died. The incidence of PPH was 10.11%(72/712), and PPH related mortality was 9.72%(7/72). There were 7 cases of early PPH and 65 cases of delayed PPH. There were 23 cases of mild PPH and 49 cases of severe PPH. (2) Analysis of influencing factors for PPH. Results of univariate analysis showed that preoperative serum total bilirubin (TBil), extended surgery, postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative biliary fistula, postoperative abdominal infection were related factors for delayed PPH ( χ2=13.17, 3.93, 87.89, 22.77, 36.13, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that preoperative serum TBil ≥171 μmol/L, postoperative grade B or C pancreatic fistula, postoperative biliary fistula, postoperative abdominal infection were independent risk factors for delayed PPH ( odds ratio=1.91, 8.10, 2.11, 2.42, 95% confidence interval as 1.09-3.33, 4.62-14.20, 1.06-4.23,1.35-4.31, P<0.05). (3) Treatment of PPH. ① Treatment of early PPH. Of the 7 cases with early PPH, 4 cases had mild PPH and 3 cases had severe PPH. The 4 cases with mild PPH were stanched by conservative treatment. The bleeding location of the 3 cases with severe PPH were the posterior wall of pancreatoenteric anastomosis, the pancreatic uncinate stump and the unintentional puncture of the jejunostomy tube of the left upper abdominal wall vessels and the 3 cases were stanched by reoperation. All the 7 cases were discharged without other complications. ② Treatment of delayed PPH. Of the 65 cases with delayed PPH, 19 cases had mild PPH and 46 cases had severe PPH. Of the 19 cases with mild PPH, 18 cases were stanched by conservative treatment including 2 cases died of pancreatic fistula and abdominal infection, 1 case were stanched by endoscope therapy. Of the 46 cases with severe PPH, 18 cases with stable vital signs and slow bleeding were stanched by conservative treatment including 1 case died of infectious toxic shock and the other 28 cases underwent invasive treatment, including 2 cases undergoing gastroscopy, 20 cases undergoing interventional treatment and 6 cases under-going reoperation as the initial treatment. Of the 22 cases taking endoscope or interventional treatment as the initial treatment, 5 cases underwent rebleeding and 2 cases died, with the reblee-ding rate and mortality as 22.7%(5/22) and 9.1%(2/22), respectively. Of the 6 cases taking reopera-tion as the initial treatment, 3 cases underwent rebleeding and 2 cases died, with the rebleeding rate and mortality as 3/6 and 2/6, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rebleeding rate and mortality in patients taking endoscope or interventional treatment as the initial treatment and patients taking reoperation as the initial treatment ( P>0.05). Of the 28 cases undergoing invasive treatment, 10 cases underwent secondary surgical treatment, including 6 cases taking reoperation and 4 cases taking interventional treatment as the initial treatment for hemorrhage, and 4 cases died with the mortality as 4/10, and the other 18 cases who did not receive secondary surgical treatment survived. There was a significant difference in the mortality between patients with or without secondary surgical treatment ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Preoperative serum TBil ≥171 μmol/L, post-operative grade B or C pancreatic fistula, postoperative biliary fistula, postoperative abdominal infection are independent risk factors for delayed PPH. Surgical treatment should be performed decisively for early severe PPH. For delayed severe PPH patients who undergoing conservative treat-ment without effect, endoscope therapy and interventional treatment should be the first choice, and surgical treatment should be performed if those above procedures not working.
ABSTRACT
Sixty-six volunteers,including 24 subjects with normal glucose tolerance(NGT),18 patients with impaired glucose regulation (IGR),and 24 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ),underwent a test of continuous glucose monitoring.The data of continuous glucose monitoring were embedded into two-dimension Euclid space by Takens' embedding theory.Glycemic phase diagram was drawn by MATLAB.The area and center distance of glycemic phase diagram were calculated by computer.The distinction of glycemic variability and average glycemic level among different glucose regulation populations were analyzed.The results showed that there existed significant differences in body mass index,systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,low density lipoprotein-cholesterol,high density lipoprotein-cholesterol,triglyceride,total cholesterol,creatinine,and alanine aminotransferase among three groups( all P＜0.05 ).The levels of HbAIC,fasting plasma glucose( FPG ),postprandial 2 h plasma glucse (2hPG),area and center distance of glycemic phase diagram in T2DM group were higher than those in NGT and IGR groups( P＜0.01 ),and the levels of FPG,2hPG,area and center distance of glycemic phase diagram in IGR group were higher than those in NGT group( P＜0.01 ).The levels of FPG and 2hPG were correlated with area and center distance of glycemic phase diagram ( all P＜0.01 ).These results suggest that measuring the area and center distance of glycemic phase diagram is a good method to assess glycemic variability and average glycemic level during continuous glucose monitoring.
ABSTRACT
objective To investigate the ability of insulin sensitivity index HOMA2-%S and secretion function index HOMA2-%B calculated by HOMA2,the new homeostasis model assessment,in clinical application. Methods Eighty female volunteers with polycystic ovary syndrome in Chongqing area [50 subjects with normal glucose tolerance(NGT group)and 30 subjects with impaired glucose regulation(IGR group)]were involved in this study.Thev underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test(OGTF)and the Botnia clamp test. From the data of faming blood samples in OGTF,insulin sensitivity index HOMAI-ISI,secretion function index HOMAl-β and disposal index DI-HOMA1 were calculated by the old homeostasis model assessment(HOMA I),meanwhile insulin sensitivity index HOMA2-%S,secretion function index HOMA2-%B and disposal index(DI-HOMA2) were caleulated by the new homeostasis model assessment (HOMA2).Correlation coefficients between insulin sensitivity index and GIR (the glucose infusion rate at steady state of Botnia clamp test),and between insulin secretion function index and AIR(the acute insulin response in Botnia clamp test),were studied.Results The Pearson's linear correlation coefficient between HOMA2-%S and GIR(r=0.503),HOMA1-ISI and HOMA2-%S (r= 0.990).HOMA2-%B and AIR(r=0.382),HOMA1-B and HOMA2-%B(r=0.976) were all statistically significant(a11 P<0.01).The glucose disposal indexes calculated from the HOMA2 and HOMA1 of 1GR group were significantly lower than those from the NGT group(t=2.825,P<0.Ol;t=2.222,P<0.05). Conclusion The HOMA2 is a better model in evaluating the insulin sensitivity and secretion function and is recommended to be widely used in clinical evaluation.